Skip to main content

In Vermont

$642 Million Gone.

That money was funding

25

local governments

14

state agencies

10

nonprofits

72

other recipients

How funding disruptions are hurting Vermont

Last updated September 15

Click to explore impacts

How Vermont has been hit hardest

Here are three significant ways the state has felt the impact of federal funding disruptions.

Explore the data

Take a closer look at the impact of funding disruptions, in this state or every state.

Tap for details

Disrupted funding impacts. Select a row to see full details.
Food and Nutrition$627,873,761$360,758,505
  • low-income households
  • +1
Funding slowdown
Environment$117,666,660$116,206,964
  • local communities
  • +1
Funding slowdown
Health$58,621,738$57,311,729
  • children
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program
Health$231,239,906$36,621,468
  • patients
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program
Disaster Relief$15,545,137$16,272,664
  • emergency responders
  • +1
Funding slowdown
  • temporarily restored
  • permanently restored
  • in litigation
Transportation$14,519,759$14,519,759
  • travelers
Never meaningfully begun
Environment$5,703,238$5,550,129
  • low-income households
  • +2
Never meaningfully begun
  • temporarily lost
Health$13,078,145$5,137,908
  • patients
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program
Social Services$3,937,124$3,603,571
  • unaccompanied migrant children
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program
Energy$10,167,555$3,348,934
  • low-income households
  • +2
Funding slowdown
Transportation$7,884,453$3,176,457
  • ev drivers
  • +2
Never meaningfully begun
  • permanently restored
  • temporarily lost
Disaster Relief$2,985,600$3,048,063
  • public safety
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program
Environment$2,984,406$2,984,406
  • k-12 students
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program
Employment and Labor$17,719,127$2,416,478
  • job seekers
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program
Health$1,796,554$1,796,554
  • underrepresented communities
  • +2
Funding slowdown
Energy$1,982,416$1,753,726
  • local communities
  • +3
Funding slowdown
Environment$1,559,040$1,559,040
  • urban communities
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program
  • temporarily restored
Education$1,379,752$1,034,022
  • students
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program
Health$1,885,674$917,279
  • mothers
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program
Justice and Legal$6,917,353$686,264
  • crime victims
  • +3
Funding slowdown
Housing$1,427,988$640,851
  • renters
  • +4
Funding slowdown
  • in litigation
Food and Nutrition$612,196$612,253
  • farmers
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program
Culture$1,844,588$458,418
  • local communities
  • +3
Funding slowdown
Education$449,997$449,997
  • students
  • +1
Funding slowdown
Justice and Legal$337,829$337,829
  • crime victims
  • +1
Funding slowdown
Health$845,332$326,300
  • students
  • +1
Funding slowdown
Justice and Legal$881,618$297,003
  • local communities
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program
  • in litigation
Education$270,000$139,269
  • graduate students
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program
Natural Resources$128,533$128,533
  • boaters
  • +2
Funding slowdown
29 impacts$1,152,245,479 total expected$642,094,373 total lost$0 total restored

How Vermont is fighting back

Across the country, states are going to court to force the administration to keep its promises and restore funding.

Vermont has joined9 lawsuitsand restored$0in grant disruptions.

Learn more about the work to restore promised federal funding. How states are fighting back

Methodology

All content on Lost Funds is based on publicly available data.

The primary source for grant award amounts is USAspending. Litigation information is pulled directly from court documents available via CourtListener. Expected funding figures are drawn from the strongest evidence available. We rely on award announcements when we can, falling back to agency budgets, Congressional appropriations, and historical trends. If we have only national funding levels for an impact, we estimate states’ expected shares using historical spending when possible, supplemented by program-specific allocation factors like population or highway miles.

We catalog a disruption when one of the following has occurred:

  1. the formal cancellation of funding a federal agency has committed to deliver under a grant award or contract for procurement;
  2. the freezing of funds wherein a formal cancellation does not exist, but grant and contract recipients cannot draw down funds; or
  3. a slowdown in the pace of grantmaking as measured by the number of new awards issued or fewer dollars obligated or outlaid under awards compared to previous years.

We identify funding disruptions using a variety of signals, including agency communications, directives from the administration, media coverage, litigation filings, and direct submissions.

We also track litigation arising from disruptions where the attorney general or governor of a state brings an action against President Trump, federal departments or agencies, or executive branch officials. In cases where plaintiff states seek nonmonetary relief such as an injunction, we calculate the amount under dispute for a given impact area as the aggregate of disrupted funds among plaintiff states. Where plaintiff states have specified loss amounts in their pleadings, we use those figures to calculate the amount of funding restored from litigation, otherwise we derive them from state-level estimates of funding disruptions.

Note: For the purposes of this site, states are defined as the 50 states and the District of Columbia.

How to cite the data:
Clawson, J., Kaczmarek, U., Ross, N., Scott, E. R., Shan, M., Mairson, E. & Delaney, S. (2026). Lost Funds: A States United and Grant Witness Project Tracking Funding Disruptions under the Trump Administration [Dataset]. Accessed {access date}. https://lostfunds.org

Download full dataset

Share the facts

The administration’s federal funding disruptions affect Americans in every state. Spread the word and help others learn more.