Skip to main content

In Missouri

At Least $2.29B Gone.

That money was funding

56

local governments

36

nonprofits

26

school districts

380

other recipients

How funding disruptions are hurting Missouri

Last updated October 30

Click to explore impacts

How Missouri has been hit hardest

Here are three significant ways Missouri has felt the impact of federal funding disruptions.

Employment and Labor

Programs to modernize unemployment insurance selectively ended

$558M disrupted

White House cuts aid for state unemployment systems | Axios

Energy

Rural energy modernization funding slowed

$15M disrupted

USDA Keeps Freeze on REAP Grants | DTN

Education

Migrant worker scholarships slowed

$959K disrupted

Explore the data

Take a closer look at the impact of funding disruptions, in this state or every state.

Download Missouri data Download full dataset

Tap for details

Disrupted funding impacts. Select a row to see full details.
Employment and Labor$609,043,580$558,432,038
  • job seekers
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program—
Health$964,953,745$424,321,533
  • patients
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program—
Environment$396,835,985$395,099,876
  • local communities
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
Health$304,722,066$369,679,187
  • children
  • +4
Cut-off mid-program—
Food and Nutrition$3,031,054,681$67,336,306
  • low-income households
  • +1
Funding slowdown—
Transportation$62,008,249$61,562,208
  • ev drivers
  • +2
Never meaningfully begun—
Environment$51,903,258$55,203,258
  • k-12 students
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program—
Transportation$44,687,306$42,556,506
  • pedestrians
  • +2
Funding slowdown——
Energy$47,891,114$33,293,865
  • low-income households
  • +2
Funding slowdown——
Social Services$33,292,568$32,432,149
  • unaccompanied migrant children
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program——
Transportation$31,933,577$31,933,577
  • travelers
Never meaningfully begun—
Environment$30,445,077$28,693,767
  • low-income households
  • +2
Never meaningfully begun—
Commerce$26,111,774$26,111,325
  • rural communities
  • +2
Never meaningfully begun—
Food and Nutrition$19,524,470$19,524,470
  • farmers
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Environment$17,907,725$17,907,725
  • urban communities
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program—
Disaster Relief$11,765,124$17,668,783
  • general public
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program—
Energy$14,055,715$14,995,487
  • rural communities
  • +1
Funding slowdown—
Energy$13,196,090$13,196,090
  • electricity customers
  • +1
Funding slowdown—
Education$23,203,569$12,707,839
  • graduate students
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Disaster Relief$10,602,255$9,848,113
  • rural communities
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Health$32,795,744$8,139,576
  • patients
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Education$7,031,967$8,055,802
  • students
  • +3
Funding slowdown—
Energy$7,524,568$7,447,798
  • local communities
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
Education$12,043,320$6,957,100
  • students
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Health$18,614,083$5,627,099
  • underrepresented communities
  • +4
Funding slowdown—
Energy$4,593,928$4,593,928
  • students
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
Education$6,078,466$3,947,291
  • students
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
Justice and Legal$2,141,583$2,944,774
  • crime victims
  • +3
Funding slowdown—
Science and Technology$4,978,957$2,741,893
  • researchers
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program—
Economic Development$3,379,792$2,504,792
  • small businesses
  • +3
Funding slowdown—
Social Services$3,671,612$2,302,058
  • teenagers
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program—
Housing$2,066,740$2,066,740
  • renters
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
Justice and Legal$31,659,674$1,513,280
  • crime survivors
  • +3
Funding slowdown—
Agriculture$2,492,327$1,389,937
  • underrepresented farmers
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program—
Environment$0$1,300,227
  • underserved communities
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program——
Health$3,008,564$1,228,669
  • mothers
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program——
Transportation$3,000,083$1,049,297
  • travelers
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
Education$1,908,945$958,945
  • migrant students
  • +2
Funding slowdown——
Agriculture$21,445,425$849,362
  • farmers
  • +4
Cut-off mid-program—
Environment$1,584,276$553,981
  • researchers
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Disaster Relief$590,338$340,338
  • wildfire communities
  • +1
Funding slowdown—
Education$1,650,000$314,823
  • students
Cut-off mid-program—
Education$179,506$179,662
  • educators, students
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program—
Natural Resources$177,153$90,903
  • boaters
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
Social Services$767,877$22,077
  • survivors of domestic violence
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
Culture$6,665,613$18,718
  • families, adult learners
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program——
46 impacts$5,925,188,469 total expected$2,299,643,172 total lost

How Missouri is fighting back

Across the country, states are going to court to force the administration to keep its promises and restore funding.

27 states have joined lawsuits against the administration. Missouri is not yet one of them.

Learn more about the work to restore promised federal funding. How states are fighting back

Methodology

All content on Lost Funds is based on publicly available data.

The primary source for grant award amounts is USAspending. Litigation information is pulled directly from court documents available via CourtListener. Expected funding figures are drawn from the strongest evidence available. We rely on award announcements when we can, falling back to agency budgets, Congressional appropriations, and historical trends. If we have only national funding levels for an impact, we estimate each jurisdiction’s expected share using historical spending when possible, supplemented by program-specific allocation factors like population or highway miles.

We catalog a disruption when one of the following has occurred:

  1. the formal cancellation of funding a federal agency has committed to deliver under a grant award or contract for procurement;
  2. the freezing of funds wherein a formal cancellation does not exist, but grant and contract recipients cannot draw down funds; or
  3. a slowdown in the pace of grantmaking as measured by the number of new awards issued or fewer dollars obligated or outlaid under awards compared to previous years.

We identify funding disruptions using a variety of signals, including agency communications, directives from the administration, media coverage, litigation filings, and direct submissions.

Note: For the purposes of this site, states are defined as the 50 states and the District of Columbia. We also track funding disruptions in the U.S. territories (Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the U.S. Minor Outlying Islands) and in the freely associated states (the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Republic of Palau), which receive federal funding under Compacts of Free Association with the United States.

How to cite the data:
Clawson, J., Kaczmarek, U., Ross, N., Scott, E. R., Shan, M., Mairson, E. & Delaney, S. (2026). Lost Funds: A States United and Grant Witness Project Tracking Funding Disruptions under the Trump Administration [Dataset]. Accessed {access date}. https://lostfunds.org

Download full dataset

Share the facts

The administration’s federal funding disruptions affect Americans in every state. Spread the word and help others learn more.