Skip to main content

In Indiana

$3 Billion Gone.

That money was funding

35

local governments

31

nonprofits

23

state agencies

207

other recipients

How funding disruptions are hurting Indiana

Last updated September 15

Click to explore impacts

How Indiana has been hit hardest

Here are three significant ways the state has felt the impact of federal funding disruptions.

Energy

Household energy efficiency upgrades programs cut

$50M disrupted

Agriculture

Agriculture job training assistance for veterans slowed

$213K disrupted

USDA's AgVets Program Puts $2.85M in Reach of Veteran-Focused Rural Nonprofits — Deadline July 31 | Granted AI

Environment

Four regional climate centers funding slowed

$142K disrupted

Regional Climate Centers Resume Operations After Funding Loss Led to Closures | Houston Public Media

Explore the data

Take a closer look at the impact of funding disruptions, in this state or every state.

Download Indiana data Download full dataset

Tap for details

Disrupted funding impacts. Select a row to see full details.
Food and Nutrition$3,188,706,494$745,428,500
  • low-income households
  • +1
Funding slowdown——
Health$333,307,195$640,754,324
  • children
  • +4
Cut-off mid-program——
Health$1,019,406,812$486,984,682
  • patients
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program——
Environment$303,062,117$302,750,548
  • local communities
  • +1
Funding slowdown——
Disaster Relief$370,608,123$205,781,710
  • disaster survivors
  • +2
Funding slowdown——
Energy$50,221,488$50,221,488
  • low-income households
  • +2
Funding slowdown———
Transportation$49,353,531$48,985,531
  • pedestrians
  • +2
Funding slowdown———
Transportation$47,447,872$47,143,872
  • ev drivers
  • +4
Never meaningfully begun—$74,558,357
Employment and Labor$121,623,986$41,265,072
  • job seekers
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program——
Social Services$38,521,119$38,083,119
  • unaccompanied migrant children
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program———
Environment$32,282,378$35,197,378
  • k-12 students
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program——
Transportation$31,933,577$31,933,577
  • travelers
Never meaningfully begun——
Environment$30,722,312$29,762,734
  • low-income households
  • +2
Never meaningfully begun——
Commerce$29,035,067$28,735,665
  • rural communities
  • +2
Never meaningfully begun——
Environment$22,166,564$22,139,318
  • underserved communities
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program——
Environment$18,835,905$16,835,905
  • urban communities
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program———
Disaster Relief$12,190,957$16,574,368
  • public safety
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program——
Health$20,417,984$15,660,662
  • underrepresented communities
  • +3
Funding slowdown——
Agriculture$16,877,688$12,172,989
  • farmers
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program——
Education$15,165,160$11,984,766
  • students
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program——
Energy$10,185,136$9,877,246
  • local communities
  • +3
Funding slowdown——
Justice and Legal$37,670,278$9,734,267
  • crime victims
  • +3
Funding slowdown———
Transportation$10,502,559$8,902,559
  • consumers
  • +2
Funding slowdown———
Education$10,269,142$7,571,858
  • underrepresented students
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program——
Food and Nutrition$7,025,906$7,031,672
  • farmers
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program——
Education$4,648,196$6,542,060
  • students
  • +3
Funding slowdown——
Energy$9,709,805$5,714,403
  • rural communities
Funding slowdown——
Energy$5,237,305$5,237,305
  • students
  • +2
Funding slowdown——
Health$11,887,459$4,287,279
  • students
  • +1
Funding slowdown——
Social Services$5,350,880$4,065,583
  • teenagers
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program——
Science and Technology$6,877,594$3,946,391
  • researchers
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program——
Justice and Legal$8,703,436$3,832,714
  • local communities
  • +4
Cut-off mid-program———
Health$4,847,277$3,739,978
  • mothers
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program——
Disaster Relief$4,690,322$3,431,232
  • rural communities
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program——
Education$5,502,749$3,209,714
  • graduate students
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program——
Education$5,534,193$3,002,731
  • students
  • +1
Funding slowdown——
Justice and Legal$2,183,124$2,637,619
  • crime victims
  • +2
Funding slowdown——
Health$11,319,870$2,615,609
  • patients
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program——
Housing$3,202,667$1,243,826
  • renters
  • +3
Funding slowdown——
Economic Development$2,134,834$1,024,834
  • small businesses
  • +2
Funding slowdown——
Disaster Relief$581,634$531,634
  • wildfire communities
  • +1
Funding slowdown——
Social Services$775,296$480,349
  • survivors of domestic violence
  • +2
Funding slowdown——
Environment$937,555$301,177
  • general public
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program——
Environment$3,248,267$296,503
  • researchers
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program——
Agriculture$329,520$213,091
  • veterans
  • +1
Funding slowdown——
Employment and Labor$132,372$181,750
  • workers
  • +2
Funding slowdown——
Environment$120,961$141,663
  • farmers
  • +2
Funding slowdown——
Natural Resources$201,887$114,622
  • boaters
  • +2
Funding slowdown——
48 impacts$5,925,696,553 total expected$2,928,305,877 total lost$74,558,357 total restored

How Indiana is fighting back

Across the country, states are going to court to force the administration to keep its promises and restore funding.

Indiana has not yet joined a lawsuit.

Learn more about the work to restore promised federal funding. How states are fighting back

Methodology

All content on Lost Funds is based on publicly available data.

The primary source for grant award amounts is USAspending. Litigation information is pulled directly from court documents available via CourtListener. Expected funding figures are drawn from the strongest evidence available. We rely on award announcements when we can, falling back to agency budgets, Congressional appropriations, and historical trends. If we have only national funding levels for an impact, we estimate states’ expected shares using historical spending when possible, supplemented by program-specific allocation factors like population or highway miles.

We catalog a disruption when one of the following has occurred:

  1. the formal cancellation of funding a federal agency has committed to deliver under a grant award or contract for procurement;
  2. the freezing of funds wherein a formal cancellation does not exist, but grant and contract recipients cannot draw down funds; or
  3. a slowdown in the pace of grantmaking as measured by the number of new awards issued or fewer dollars obligated or outlaid under awards compared to previous years.

We identify funding disruptions using a variety of signals, including agency communications, directives from the administration, media coverage, litigation filings, and direct submissions.

We also track litigation arising from disruptions where the attorney general or governor of a state brings an action against President Trump, federal departments or agencies, or executive branch officials. In cases where plaintiff states seek nonmonetary relief such as an injunction, we calculate the amount under dispute for a given impact area as the aggregate of disrupted funds among plaintiff states. Where plaintiff states have specified loss amounts in their pleadings, we use those figures to calculate the amount of funding restored from litigation, otherwise we derive them from state-level estimates of funding disruptions.

Note: For the purposes of this site, states are defined as the 50 states and the District of Columbia.

How to cite the data:
Clawson, J., Kaczmarek, U., Ross, N., Scott, E. R., Shan, M., Mairson, E. & Delaney, S. (2026). Lost Funds: A States United and Grant Witness Project Tracking Funding Disruptions under the Trump Administration [Dataset]. Accessed {access date}. https://lostfunds.org

Download full dataset

Share the facts

The administration’s federal funding disruptions affect Americans in every state. Spread the word and help others learn more.