Skip to main content

In Alabama

At Least $2.56B Gone.

That money was funding

55

local governments

31

nonprofits

21

colleges and universities

141

other recipients

How funding disruptions are hurting Alabama

Last updated October 30

Click to explore impacts

How Alabama has been hit hardest

Here are three significant ways Alabama has felt the impact of federal funding disruptions.

Energy

Industrial decarbonization awards selectively ended

$67M disrupted

Trump admin cuts $3.7B for industrial decarbonization and carbon capture | Canary Media

Energy

School building modernization programs gutted

$7M disrupted

Report Department of Energy Delays Funding for Energy Efficiency Work in Public Schools | SMART Union

Agriculture

Agriculture job training assistance for veterans slowed

$179K disrupted

USDA's AgVets Program Puts $2.85M in Reach of Veteran-Focused Rural Nonprofits — Deadline July 31 | Granted AI

Explore the data

Take a closer look at the impact of funding disruptions, in this state or every state.

Download Alabama data Download full dataset

Tap for details

Disrupted funding impacts. Select a row to see full details.
Food and Nutrition$4,166,642,243$924,259,159
  • low-income households
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
Health$253,766,294$433,735,617
  • children
  • +4
Cut-off mid-program—
Health$846,556,168$327,995,753
  • patients
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Disaster Relief$417,151,682$251,803,297
  • disaster survivors
  • +3
Funding slowdown—
Environment$238,009,823$237,339,918
  • local communities
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
Energy$75,000,000$67,422,685
  • workers
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program—
Transportation$58,957,339$56,575,174
  • pedestrians
  • +2
Funding slowdown——
Transportation$46,286,058$45,468,698
  • ev drivers
  • +2
Never meaningfully begun—
Environment$25,078,126$26,113,126
  • k-12 students
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Employment and Labor$76,140,021$20,307,731
  • job seekers
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program—
Environment$17,039,898$16,893,575
  • underserved communities
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Food and Nutrition$16,436,633$16,436,633
  • farmers
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program—
Disaster Relief$14,675,828$16,149,932
  • general public
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Agriculture$17,259,491$15,780,388
  • farmers
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program—
Education$22,237,957$13,422,262
  • students
  • +1
Funding slowdown—
Health$23,115,123$11,254,368
  • patients
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Energy$20,211,734$10,879,806
  • low-income households
  • +2
Funding slowdown——
Environment$12,838,177$9,838,177
  • urban communities
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program—
Education$14,926,390$8,405,794
  • graduate students
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Commerce$21,625,046$7,922,480
  • rural communities
  • +2
Never meaningfully begun—
Energy$6,859,325$6,859,325
  • students
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
Education$8,266,611$6,622,713
  • underrepresented students
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Education$6,652,059$6,210,411
  • students
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Energy$6,430,070$6,190,760
  • local communities
  • +3
Funding slowdown—
Disaster Relief$5,345,738$5,345,738
  • rural communities
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Social Services$2,476,752$3,097,666
  • teenagers
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program—
Transportation$11,648,609$3,075,575
  • consumers
  • +2
Funding slowdown——
Science and Technology$3,728,856$2,737,400
  • researchers
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Agriculture$2,597,549$2,488,070
  • underrepresented farmers
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program—
Energy$4,437,894$1,952,338
  • rural communities
Funding slowdown—
Justice and Legal$27,374,426$1,743,693
  • crime survivors
  • +3
Funding slowdown—
Health$38,871,002$1,450,222
  • underrepresented communities
  • +4
Funding slowdown—
Housing$2,220,924$665,509
  • renters
  • +3
Funding slowdown—
Education$9,889,407$565,823
  • students
Cut-off mid-program—
Health$2,193,183$361,316
  • mothers
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program——
Agriculture$179,487$179,487
  • veterans
  • +1
Funding slowdown—
Education$138,049$138,049
  • educators, students
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program—
Employment and Labor$108,294$136,112
  • workers
  • +1
Funding slowdown—
Environment$150,000$72,500
  • general public
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program—
Environment$149,998$70,131
  • researchers
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
40 impacts$6,523,672,264 total expected$2,567,967,411 total lost

How Alabama is fighting back

Across the country, states are going to court to force the administration to keep its promises and restore funding.

27 states have joined lawsuits against the administration. Alabama is not yet one of them.

Learn more about the work to restore promised federal funding. How states are fighting back

Methodology

All content on Lost Funds is based on publicly available data.

The primary source for grant award amounts is USAspending. Litigation information is pulled directly from court documents available via CourtListener. Expected funding figures are drawn from the strongest evidence available. We rely on award announcements when we can, falling back to agency budgets, Congressional appropriations, and historical trends. If we have only national funding levels for an impact, we estimate each jurisdiction’s expected share using historical spending when possible, supplemented by program-specific allocation factors like population or highway miles.

We catalog a disruption when one of the following has occurred:

  1. the formal cancellation of funding a federal agency has committed to deliver under a grant award or contract for procurement;
  2. the freezing of funds wherein a formal cancellation does not exist, but grant and contract recipients cannot draw down funds; or
  3. a slowdown in the pace of grantmaking as measured by the number of new awards issued or fewer dollars obligated or outlaid under awards compared to previous years.

We identify funding disruptions using a variety of signals, including agency communications, directives from the administration, media coverage, litigation filings, and direct submissions.

Note: For the purposes of this site, states are defined as the 50 states and the District of Columbia. We also track funding disruptions in the U.S. territories (Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the U.S. Minor Outlying Islands) and in the freely associated states (the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Republic of Palau), which receive federal funding under Compacts of Free Association with the United States.

How to cite the data:
Clawson, J., Kaczmarek, U., Ross, N., Scott, E. R., Shan, M., Mairson, E. & Delaney, S. (2026). Lost Funds: A States United and Grant Witness Project Tracking Funding Disruptions under the Trump Administration [Dataset]. Accessed {access date}. https://lostfunds.org

Download full dataset

Share the facts

The administration’s federal funding disruptions affect Americans in every state. Spread the word and help others learn more.